Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Born to Kill (1947)

  1. #1
    Administrator City Editor Steve-O's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    City of Fear
    Posts
    4,087
    Thanks
    288
    Thanked 186 Times in 120 Posts
    Claire Trevor
    as Helen Brent
    Lawrence Tierney
    as Sam Wild
    Walter Slezak
    as Matthew Arnett

    Default

    Posted by Karen on 5/22/2006, 6:52 am

    Born to Kill is one of those noirs that I keep in my pocket like the last peppermint. Sometimes I forget about it, but I'm so pleased when I run across it, because it's just so good.

    Born to Kill tells the story of Helen Brent (Claire Trevor) and Sam Wild (Lawrence Tierney), who meet on a train platform on their way to San Francisco. Helen is returning home after her divorce; Sam is hightailing it out of town after murdering his girlfriend and the man he found her with. Although Helen is engaged to one of Frisco's wealthiest eligible bachelors, she is strongly attracted to Sam, who ingratiates himself into her family when they reach San Francisco, and winds up marrying Helen's affluent foster sister, Georgia (Audrey Long). Over the course of the film, Sam continues to pile up corpses -- he kills his best friend, Marty (Elisha Cook, Jr.), after mistakenly suspecting him of having an affair with Helen, and he winds up fatally shooting Helen as well, just before he himself is shot and killed by police.

    This film is fairly brimming with a melange of quirky, unforgettable characters. Among these are Laury Palmer (Isabel Jewell), a comely boardinghouse dweller who provides instant insight into her personality when she describes her new boyfriend, Sam, to her landlady: "He's the quiet sort, but you get the feeling that if you got out of line, he'd kick your teeth down your throat." Laury says these words not with a sense of fear or dismay, but with a look of rapturous admiration on her face. Her landlady, Mrs. Kraft (Esther Howard) obviously shares the feeling, as she sighs plaintively and responds, "My, ain't that wonderful. I never knew a man like that. My two husbands was just turnips." Unfortunately for Laury, Sam is no turnip. After he spots her at a nightclub with another man, he murders them both in a jealous rage.

    It is Helen, incidentally, who finds the bodies of Laury and her date. However, her natural reaction is not to recoil in terror, or scream, or faint. She doesn't even utter a gasp or alter her facial muscles to wince in disgust. She also doesn't trouble herself to report the crime to the police. Instead, she softly closes the door on the horrific scene and telephones the train station for a schedule of outgoing freights. As she later explains to her sister, Georgia, "it's a lot of bother -- coroner's inquests and all that sort of stuff."

    Unlike most noir films featuring these immoral femmes, Born to Kill, at least to some degree, provides insight into Helen's past. Adopted by a wealthy family, she apparently never felt that she truly belonged. Her sister's subsequent sole inheritance of the family fortune only served to deepen Helen's bitter sense of inadequacy, and heighten her resolve to become independent through her own means -- hence her engagement to a San Francisco attorney, Fred Grover (Phillip Terry), whom she views as "goodness and safety."

    Born to Kill was based on the book, "Deadlier Than the Male," by James Gunn, an obvious reference to the black widow spider, who mates with, then devours her male counterpart. The analogy provides an fitting representation of Helen -- although she is attracted to Sam, her compulsion to destroy him is evidenced in a number of ways. In one scene, she subtly lets a private detective know that Sam may be connected to the double murder in Reno--in another, she sides against Sam in his bid to run the family business. And finally, it is Helen who tells Georgia about the murders that Sam has committed and notifies the police.

    It's also worth noting that there seems to be a shred -- albeit a tiny one -- of decency within Helen, a part of her that realizes the kind of person she has become and wants desperately to change. She tells Sam that, to her, Fred represents peace and security. "Without him, I'm afraid of the things I'll do, afraid of what I might become," she admits. "Fred is goodness and safety." And later, when Fred breaks their engagement, Helen begs him to stay. "If you leave me, I haven't a chance," she tells him. But Fred leaves her nonetheless--he isn't up to the task of saving Helen from herself.

    In many films of this era, one character is cunningly guided by another into the land of deceit and murder, not realizing until it is too late that he or she has been victimized. In Born to Kill, however, Helen knows from her first glimpse of Sam that he represents danger, and it doesn't take her long to deduce that he is a murderer. Yet, this knowledge only heightens her excitement and increases her desire to be a part of his life. She willingly goes into his dark world and when she finds herself mortally wounded by his gunshot, can only state with a sense of irony, "Fred was right . . . this time I didn't land on my feet." Click here to view the original Webpage.

  2. #2
    Night Editor Outfit boss Adam Lounsbery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    394
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts

    Default Born to Kill (1947)

    Robert Wise's Born to Kill has never been one of my favorite noirs. It regularly tops "best of" lists, and many film noir enthusiasts whom I respect love it, so I was hoping a fresh viewing would reveal something new to me.

    Alas, for me it was still the same old flick. It's an enjoyable picture, but it's wildly melodramatic, there are subplots that never really go anywhere, and its over-the-top characters are mostly two-dimensional. The key to a great noir, like Billy Wilder's Double Indemnity (1944), is the sense that it could happen to you, or to someone you know. No matter how outlandish the schemes in a film are, if they're carried out by believable characters then I'm usually able to go along for the ride without asking too many questions.

    Born to Kill tells the tale of a pair of sociopathic social climbers, the recently divorced Helen Brent (Claire Trevor) and the recently paroled Sam Wild (Lawrence Tierney). Their paths cross in Reno, the biggest little city in the world. Helen is there for a quickie divorce and Sam is there with his reedy little sidekick, Mart Waterman (Elisha Cook Jr.). Helen is staying at a boarding house run by the slovenly Mrs. Kraft (Esther Howard), who, when we first see her, is getting lit up on beer in the middle of the afternoon with the adenoidal tart Laury Palmer (Isabel Jewell).

    After Laury goes on a date with dapper Danny Jaden (Tony Barrett) just to make the big lug she's dating jealous, she invites Danny inside for a nightcap. When Danny goes to the kitchen, he finds Laury's big lug waiting for him. It's Sam Wild, of course, and his brutal killing of both Danny and Laury is the film's high point. (Or the lurid low point, if you're a prissy scold.) The sound of crickets in the background, the neatly manicured suburban lawns surrounding Mrs. Kraft's boarding house, the dog barking in the background, and the uptempo swing music playing on the radio in the kitchen all lend a sense of immediacy and familiarity to the murder.

    The rest of the film, however, just doesn't hang together for me. Sam's little buddy Mart tells him, "You can't just go around killing people whenever the notion strikes you. It just ain't feasible." I feel the same way about the plot of Born to Kill. It just ain't feasible.

    After the murder, Sam blows town. He and Helen meet again on the train to San Francisco. When they disembark, Sam suggests splitting a cab, but Helen tells him she's going in a different direction. He responds, "That's where you're wrong. We're going in the same direction, you and I."

    Sam insinuates himself into Helen's life. They are clearly drawn to each other, but she tells him that nothing in the world will stop her from marrying her fiancé, Fred Grover (Phillip Terry). So Sam moves in on her sister, wealthy heiress Georgia Staples (Audrey Long), or, to be more precise, her foster sister, as Helen bitterly reveals to Sam. Not only is Georgia a beautiful blonde, but — as Sam tells Mart — "Marrying into this crowd will make it so's I can spit in anyone's eye."

    Meanwhile, back in Reno, Mrs. Kraft retains the services of a sleazy, corpulent private investigator named Matthew Albert Arnett (Walter Slezak). Mrs. Kraft is played by Esther Howard, and her bizarre, bug-eyed performance in this film is nearly identical to the "Filthy Flora" character she played in Dick Tracy vs. Cueball (1946).

    Helen and Sam pursue their doomed, twisted love affair. ("Fred is peace and security," Helen moans. "You, you're strength, excitement, and depravity. You've a kind of corruption inside of you, Sam.") Arnett sniffs around. Sam and Georgia quarrel after she refuses to let him run her family's business. Mart Waterman shows up in San Francisco and starts living with the unhappy foursome. (Is he Sam's partner or his secret lover? The film is never completely clear.) Slowly but surely, the plot threads of the film intertwine, culminating in an orgy of murder and betrayal.

    This is the second or third time I've seen Born to Kill. While I've griped about the ridiculously melodramatic plot, maybe I just want it to be something it's not. I could certainly see myself watching it again in the future and loving its over-the-top characters, unrealistic scenarios, grotesque supporting players, and generally high level of camp.

    I think my biggest problem with Born to Kill is the relationship between Sam and Helen. Claire Trevor is a wonderful performer, but I was never able to accept that she'd love Sam enough to give up everything for him. Helen's histrionics in her scenes in tastefully appointed drawing rooms with Fred, Georgia, and Sam seem more scripted than natural, and Claire Trevor's performance as Helen seems too intelligent and composed for the debased character she's playing.

    But maybe that's the point. Lawrence Tierney is a powerful presence, but he isn't a particularly gifted actor, especially when either subtlety or range is called for. Not only does Sam Wild commit murder whenever the notion strikes him, he can bend others to his will, getting his friend Mart to kill for him and getting Helen to provide him with an alibi for murder at the drop of a hat. He's a brutal alpha male, and loving him may go against all reason and sense, but that never stopped anybody before.

    Born to Kill is directed by Robert Wise with vigor. The cinematography, by Robert de Grasse, is great, especially in the nighttime exteriors. Paul Sawtell's music is exciting. I found the plot ridiculous, but that shouldn't stop any noir fans who haven't seen Born to Kill from seeking it out.

    (Originally published on my blog, OCD Viewer.)

  3. #3
    snitch HighGallows's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Twin Cities, Minnesota
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Adam, this is a great-write up about a film that I am also lukewarm about. You call out many of the same problems that I have with the film (the infeasibility of it all, the lack of an ability to relate to the story and/or characters, etc.) as well as the points that I also admire (mainly the performances, especially from Claire Trevor who is one of my favorites).

    But the main problem I have with the film is its lack of style. I would not necessarily say that Wise directs the film with "vigor" - unlike his extremely stylish and compelling The Set-Up made two years later. His shot choices feel very safe and do not strike much of a chord with me - and for a film often touted as "noir," there are very few shadowy sequences.

    Overall I would say that Born To Kill is not a bad film, just a disappointing one - certainly worthwhile for fans of the genre - and, again, kudos on a well-written review.
    ~ Build my gallows high, baby ~

  4. #4
    Night Editor Outfit boss Adam Lounsbery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    394
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Thanks, HighGallows. I think when I said "vigor" I just meant that Born to Kill is a fast-paced film, and while I've never loved it, I've also never found it boring. I agree that The Set-Up is far and away a better film (it's one of my favorite noirs, not to mention one of the best boxing films AND one of the best "real-time" thrillers).

    Back to Born to Kill ... while most of the interiors, especially in the second half of the film, involve pretty "safe" filmmaking, there were more nicely constructed shots and fine noir lighting than I remembered from my initial viewing. The murder sequences in the boarding house and later, on the beach, are both pretty great. But you're right that there are many sections of the film that are quite uninteresting from a stylistic perspective.

  5. #5
    Movie Memories Outfit boss Movie Memories's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    I would also share the same feelings toward the film and suspect that what makes Born To Kill a favorite of noir enthusiasts can be summed up in two words...Lawrence Tierney.

    His work in that film along with The Devil Thumbs a Ride, Bodyguard, and possibly The Hoodlum, make him iconic to noir.

    And Adam, good luck with the move to Chicago.

  6. #6
    Night Editor Outfit boss Adam Lounsbery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    394
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Thanks, Movie Memories. I'm looking forward to it.

    About Lawrence Tierney, I think it's a real shame that he never played Mike Hammer. He is EXACTLY how I picture Spillane's character, even before I knew who Lawrence Tierney was. Personally, I liked The Devil Thumbs a Ride better than Born to Kill, but it could be because it was weirder and more quirky.

  7. #7
    Outfit boss MartinTeller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    http://martintellermovies.com
    Posts
    275
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

    Default

    I'm glad I'm not alone on this. Two viewings and it's failed to wow me.

    (review from 6/17/06)

    A hybrid of unsophisticated noir and unsophisticated soap opera doesn't make for genius filmmaking, but it's pretty fun camp. Lawrence Tierney's legendary tough/intimidating/completely insane persona is allowed free rein here. He's a scary guy but he's sure got screen presence. Rating: 7


    (review from 3/21/10 -- note this was watched immediately after Dillinger)

    Might as well do back-to-back Lawrence Tierney flicks. He's even more menacing and psychotic here, really a scary mofo. Walter Slezak and Esther Howard are also both very memorable in their small roles. The movie has a lot of trashy, campy charm to it, and with its dark psychological themes of sexual obsession it's much closer to noir than Dillinger. But on the whole it's just too soapy, largely due to the terrible, string-heavy score and the upper-class setting. There's also not much of the style later evident in Wise's The Set-Up. A few of the scenes really sing, but a number of them come off as flat. Rating: 7

  8. #8
    Night Editor Outfit boss Adam Lounsbery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    394
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinTeller View Post
    Might as well do back-to-back Lawrence Tierney flicks. He's even more menacing and psychotic here, really a scary mofo. Walter Slezak and Esther Howard are also both very memorable in their small roles. The movie has a lot of trashy, campy charm to it, and with its dark psychological themes of sexual obsession it's much closer to noir than Dillinger. But on the whole it's just too soapy, largely due to the terrible, string-heavy score and the upper-class setting. There's also not much of the style later evident in Wise's The Set-Up. A few of the scenes really sing, but a number of them come off as flat. Rating: 7
    This second review is pretty tight, Martin. Pretty much sums up in a nutshell what I like and don't like about Born to Kill.

  9. #9
    snitch NOTW comment bot: comments from Noiroftheweek.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    240
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default * Finally saw it last night for the first time ......

    * Finally saw it last night for the first time ... I think that it's more of a success as "cult" than as "noir" ... The campy, over-the-top elelement in this film is SO overwhelming that it places it almost in the category of a film like, say, "The Bad Seed" -- in which the enjoyment is because it's SO ludicrous ... (I think I'd probably have to put "Too Late for Tears" in the same basket, for instance -- & certainly the Crawford vehicle "Female on the Beach") ... I'm looking forward to the Muller commentary...

    * In other words, of course it can't stand comparison to a film like "Double Indemnity" -- a perfectly-written stone-cold genre-transcending masterpiece ... Or even an A-grade "cult" noir like "Kiss Me Deadly" or something like that ... But for what it is, it's extremely entertaining I'd have to say!

    comment by dumbkopf



    This comment was made at Noiroftheweek.com.



    2012-09-18T23:01:09.938-05:00

  10. #10
    Bon Vivant snitch Christina Delassalle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    This is one of my all time favorite movies, regardless of the genre.

    I can watch it anytime. It's really such cheesy good fun. Lawrence Tierney is so good at being bad and Claire Trevor is no slouch either. Throw in Ester Howard and Elisha Cook Jr. and you have a cast that can't be beat.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Christina Delassalle For This Useful Post:

    cigar joe (10-28-2012)

  12. #11
    snitch MFPhoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Silver Spring MD
    Posts
    104
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

    Thumbs up

    The on-again, off-again love/hate relationship between the film’s two main characters is quite uneven making the storyline muddled and confusing. But for some reason this film early on grabbed my attention and never let go. Partly this may be due to the performances. Much is due to the talents of director Robert Wise, here in an early effort making the best movie possible from a drab and disorganized script. I’ll give Born to Kill a 7 out of 10 as well.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Lessons from Sherlock Holmes: How do you kill your hero? - Scientific American (blog)
    By Film Noir Press - Noir news from the internet in forum Film Noir News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-09-2012, 02:48 PM
  2. Sin City: A Dame to Kill For Gets October 2013 Release - Comic Book Resources
    By Film Noir Press - Noir news from the internet in forum Film Noir News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-17-2012, 08:31 PM
  3. Kill Me Again (1989)
    By Steve-O in forum Neo-noir and Noir TV
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-03-2011, 10:01 AM
  4. Joan Fontaine / Born to Be Bad
    By Roger Wade in forum Film Noir
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-13-2011, 03:40 PM
  5. Born Out of Time - Eva Mendes
    By Andrew666 in forum Neo-noir and Noir TV
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2011, 03:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •